<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trade Naked &#187; Three Months</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/tag/three-months/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com</link>
	<description>Trade Options Safely and Profitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:31:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Which Volatility To Look At?</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/07/which-volatility-to-look-at/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/07/which-volatility-to-look-at/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[80s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Csfb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six Months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three Months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volatility Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vxv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Cost Collar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=1292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason Goepfert compared the VIX, at six month lows, to the CSFB volatility index, which measures the skew three months out.  He compares other times that the VIX has been low and the CSFB has been high and states that the S&#38;P has declined three months out.
Here is the chart from his post:
Adam Warner doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Goepfert <a title="Battle of the Fear Indexes" rel="nofollow" href="http://sentimentrader.blogspot.com/2009/07/battle-of-fear-indexes.html" target="_blank">compared the VIX, at six month lows, to the CSFB volatility index</a>, which measures the skew three months out.  He compares other times that the VIX has been low and the CSFB has been high and states that the S&amp;P has declined three months out.</p>
<p>Here is the chart from his post:</p>
<div id="attachment_1293" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/volcomparison7-7-09.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1293" title="volcomparison7-7-09" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/volcomparison7-7-09-300x264.png" alt="SPX on top, VIX in the middle, and CSFB skew index bottom" width="300" height="264" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">SPX on top, VIX in the middle, and CSFB skew index bottom</p></div>
<p>Adam Warner <a title="Battle of the Network Fear Indices" rel="nofollow" href="http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/battle-of-network-fear-indices.html" target="_blank">doesn&#8217;t see that the CSFB skew index adds much value</a>.     He points out the huge dip in CSFB last October when VIX was hitting the 80s.  That has put many people off this index, why would there be a dip there?</p>
<p>CSFB tells you what your deductible would be on the put side if you were paying for it with a 10% out of the money call three months out.  What that means is, find the price of the call three months from now that is 10 % above the market.  Then look for the put three months out that sells for the same amount.  How far is that below the market?  That is CSFB for today.</p>
<p>To put on a zero- cost collar with options that expire in three months, sell the 990 call (SPX at 900) and that will finance  the put 19% below, at 729.  This is about 2/3rds of the max skew that CSFB has seen.</p>
<p>So last October, all the puts had high vol so the skew was low.   Counterintuitve, but possible.</p>
<p>One detail straight off is that the comparison should be with the VXV not VIX since VXV and the skew index measure three months out.  Here is what VXV looks like:</p>
<div id="attachment_1294" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image001.gif"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1294" title="VXV 7-7-09" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/image001-300x160.gif" alt="S&amp;P 500 Options Volatility Three Months Out" width="300" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">S&amp;P 500 Options Volatility Three Months Out</p></div>
<p>Not very different than VIX, a little higher, but still at a low point of the last six months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/07/which-volatility-to-look-at/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>358 Days Later&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/358-days-later/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/358-days-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Goepfert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moving Average]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nbsp Nbsp Nbsp Nbsp Nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Percentage Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three Months]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is from Sentiment&#8217;s Edge by Jason Goepfert.   Three months after this market closed above its 200 day moving average will be the end of August which is usually a volatile, read down, time for the market.  We&#8217;ll see if this pattern holds up.  Always interesting.

The S&#38;P 500 is poised to close above its 200-day [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from Sentiment&#8217;s Edge by Jason Goepfert.   Three months after this market closed above its 200 day moving average will be the end of August which is usually a volatile, read down, time for the market.  We&#8217;ll see if this pattern holds up.  Always interesting.<br />
<span id="more-602"></span><br />
The S&amp;P 500 is poised to close above its 200-day moving average today for the first time in 358 trading days, the 2nd-longest streak in its history.</p>
<div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_OoAPC4g7bwE/SiPi-C2vJ8I/AAAAAAAAAPQ/Nybths9edGk/s1600-h/20090601_spx.jpg"><img src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/f85fb_20090601_spx.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>Here are the other streaks of longer than 250 days without a close above the 200-day average, and the S&amp;P&#8217;s percentage change three months later:</p>
<p>DATE          STREAK          CHANGE</p>
<p>08/05/32      414                   +6.3%</p>
<p>06/22/38      253                   +13.9%</p>
<p>09/25/70      330                   +9.4%</p>
<p>01/29/75      314                   +13.0%</p>
<p>01/04/02      314                   -4.0%</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll look closer at these streaks on the <a href="http://www.sentimentrader.com/">main site</a> tomorrow.</p>
<div><img src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70069_1910734679953918221-4795426476701023499?l=sentimentrader.blogspot.com" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/358-days-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

