<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trade Naked &#187; options</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/tag/options/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com</link>
	<description>Trade Options Safely and Profitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:31:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Earnings of Robots Eating Tacos</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/07/earnings-of-robots-eating-tacos/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/07/earnings-of-robots-eating-tacos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chipotle Mexican Grill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isrg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mcdonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straddle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tacos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volatility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=1463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At 4:30 Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), maker of surgical robots, and at 5 PM Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), a spin-off of McDonalds three years ago, announce earnings.  These guys can move on earnings.
Chipotle Mexican Grill
First, let&#8217;s look at past earnings announcements and the close to open change in price.



Date
Open Price
Closing Price
C-&#62; O Return


2/14/2008
112.49
108.65


2/15/2008
97.07
105.25
-10.66%


4/23/2008
116
109.9


4/24/2008
107.21
100
-2.45%


7/23/2008
82.11
83.8


7/24/2008
73.68
67.3
-12.08%


10/22/2008
42.91
41.08


10/23/2008
42.28
44.29
2.92%


2/11/2009
48.17
47.42


2/12/2009
50.71
53.25
6.94%


4/22/2009
80
85.5


4/23/2009
92.39
85.31
8.06%



It&#8217;s trading at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 4:30 Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), maker of surgical robots, and at 5 PM Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), a spin-off of McDonalds three years ago, announce earnings.  These guys can move on earnings.</p>
<h3>Chipotle Mexican Grill</h3>
<p>First, let&#8217;s look at past earnings announcements and the close to open change in price.</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Date</td>
<td>Open Price</td>
<td>Closing Price</td>
<td>C-&gt; O Return</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2/14/2008</td>
<td>112.49</td>
<td>108.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2/15/2008</td>
<td>97.07</td>
<td>105.25</td>
<td>-10.66%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4/23/2008</td>
<td>116</td>
<td>109.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4/24/2008</td>
<td>107.21</td>
<td>100</td>
<td>-2.45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7/23/2008</td>
<td>82.11</td>
<td>83.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7/24/2008</td>
<td>73.68</td>
<td>67.3</td>
<td>-12.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10/22/2008</td>
<td>42.91</td>
<td>41.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10/23/2008</td>
<td>42.28</td>
<td>44.29</td>
<td>2.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2/11/2009</td>
<td>48.17</td>
<td>47.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2/12/2009</td>
<td>50.71</td>
<td>53.25</td>
<td>6.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4/22/2009</td>
<td>80</td>
<td>85.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4/23/2009</td>
<td>92.39</td>
<td>85.31</td>
<td>8.06%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s trading at 90 and the 90 August straddle goes for $10.  So we could try a calendar at 80 and 100.  (Click on the charts to enlarge).<br />
<a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/cmgdualcalendar22-7-09.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1464" title="cmgdualcalendar22-7-09" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/cmgdualcalendar22-7-09-300x182.png" alt="cmgdualcalendar22-7-09" width="300" height="182" /></a></p>
<p>If after earnings tonight, the volatility of the August options collapses to the September values the return graph for tomorrow is the colored curve.  It is positive from 80 to 108.  (Click on the charts to enlarge).</p>
<div id="attachment_1465" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/cmgdualcalendaraftervolcollapse_22-7-09.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1465" title="cmgdualcalendaraftervolcollapse_22-7-09" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/cmgdualcalendaraftervolcollapse_22-7-09-300x205.png" alt="Return After Volatility Collapse" width="300" height="205" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Return After Volatility Collapse</p></div>
<p><span id="more-1463"></span></p>
<h3>Intuitive Surgical</h3>
<p>Here is a table of the last few returns from the close just before earnings to the open right after earnings are releases.</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Date</td>
<td>Open Price</td>
<td>Closing Price</td>
<td>C-&gt; O Return</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10/18/2007</td>
<td>239.36</td>
<td>256.44</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10/19/2007</td>
<td>268.74</td>
<td>269.34</td>
<td>4.80%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1/31/2008</td>
<td>229.05</td>
<td>254</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2/1/2008</td>
<td>292.73</td>
<td>305.61</td>
<td>15.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4/17/2008</td>
<td>346.1</td>
<td>348.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4/18/2008</td>
<td>310.54</td>
<td>288.5</td>
<td>-10.89%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7/22/2008</td>
<td>278.52</td>
<td>280.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7/23/2008</td>
<td>313.49</td>
<td>331.13</td>
<td>11.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10/16/2008</td>
<td>195.28</td>
<td>214.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10/17/2008</td>
<td>193.9</td>
<td>189.13</td>
<td>-9.73%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1/22/2009</td>
<td>97.99</td>
<td>96.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1/23/2009</td>
<td>88.08</td>
<td>93.29</td>
<td>-8.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4/16/2009</td>
<td>122.81</td>
<td>118</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4/17/2009</td>
<td>116.87</td>
<td>130.35</td>
<td>-0.96%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The ISRG straddle is selling for $22.50 or 13.3% the average move on earnings is 0.32%, but the average absolute move is 8.82%.  So 13.3% is still high.  They are expecting a large move.  Let&#8217;s see what the dual calendar spread would do if we center it around 145 and 190.  (Click on the charts to enlarge).</p>
<p><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/isrgdualcalendar22-7-09.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1466" title="isrgdualcalendar22-7-09" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/isrgdualcalendar22-7-09-300x205.png" alt="isrgdualcalendar22-7-09" width="300" height="205" /></a></p>
<p>If the volatility collapses, we have:</p>
<p><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/isrgdualcalendaraftervolcollapse_22-7-09.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1467" title="isrgdualcalendaraftervolcollapse_22-7-09" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/isrgdualcalendaraftervolcollapse_22-7-09-300x157.png" alt="isrgdualcalendaraftervolcollapse_22-7-09" width="300" height="157" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/07/earnings-of-robots-eating-tacos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday Options School</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/07/sunday-options-school/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/07/sunday-options-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Butterfly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deconstruct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gamma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Knife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypothesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profit Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purple Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ugliness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=1380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s deconstruct, for fun and education, AW&#8217;s ICE recovery trade.  This is why he picked ICE. 

but basically, just look for generally uptrending names, and then short some puts into mini dips
My guess is that the mini dip where he sold some puts was at the point marked 1.  My guess is that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s deconstruct, for fun and education, <a href="http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/2009/07/ice-creamed.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="ICE Creamed">AW&#8217;s ICE recovery trade</a>.  This is why he picked ICE. </p>
<blockquote><p>
but basically, just look for generally uptrending names, and then short some puts into mini dips</p></blockquote>
<p>My guess is that the mini dip where he sold some puts was at the point marked 1.  My guess is that he sold 105 puts.  Just to keep the trades concrete, say he started out short 10 July 105 puts.  I don&#8217;t know and he won&#8217;t say.  </p>
<p><a href="http://content.screencast.com/users/gkreiter/folders/Jing/media/7c392c45-555a-4224-9315-a3e96780bf76/2009-07-12_1802.png"><img class="embeddedObject" src="http://content.screencast.com/users/gkreiter/folders/Jing/media/7c392c45-555a-4224-9315-a3e96780bf76/2009-07-12_1802.png" width="550" height="300" border="0" /></a><br />
The &#8220;T&#8221; on the chart labels the day that ICE fell through the 105 strike like a hot knife through butter.  AW was in trouble. </p>
<blockquote><p>
So I ended up covering by turning the put short into a butterfly, going long the 100 strike. That was the mediocre.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Long twice as many 100 puts as he was short 105 sounds good to me.  Of course, if this is a butterfly, then he was also short, maybe, the 95 puts.  So now our hypothesis is that his position is:</p>
<p>-10 105 P,<br />
+20 100 P and<br />
-10 95 P</p>
<p>And he has turned his profit distribution from this:</p>
<p><a href="http://content.screencast.com/users/gkreiter/folders/Jing/media/ba1d8397-8112-4dcd-be01-dca5793e8396/2009-07-12_1738.png"><img class="embeddedObject" src="http://content.screencast.com/users/gkreiter/folders/Jing/media/ba1d8397-8112-4dcd-be01-dca5793e8396/2009-07-12_1738.png" width="550" height="300" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>To this:</p>
<p><a href="http://content.screencast.com/users/gkreiter/folders/Jing/media/f25d10dd-d495-4ac6-ade3-2f52af17e32f/2009-07-12_1740.png"><img class="embeddedObject" src="http://content.screencast.com/users/gkreiter/folders/Jing/media/f25d10dd-d495-4ac6-ade3-2f52af17e32f/2009-07-12_1740.png" width="550" height="300" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Look at the purple line, since that is where the position is when it is put on.  He is working his way to breakeven if ICE keeps falling, but no better than break even.  Hence &#8220;mediocre&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Stock kept going lower, so then had my one good idea. Just converted it to long downside gamma by shorting more 105 puts so that I was now short the 105-100 put spread 1:1, and then bought an equal number of 95 puts and a little stock.
</p></blockquote>
<p>So the hypothetical position now looks like:</p>
<p>-20 105 P<br />
+20 100 P<br />
+20 95 P</p>
<p>The position gets to break even at 86.  Which is where it closed Friday.<br />
<a href="http://content.screencast.com/users/gkreiter/folders/Jing/media/8da9df9f-fc6e-4f1e-98e3-db52e5ac519f/2009-07-12_1747.png"><img class="embeddedObject" src="http://content.screencast.com/users/gkreiter/folders/Jing/media/8da9df9f-fc6e-4f1e-98e3-db52e5ac519f/2009-07-12_1747.png" width="550" height="300" border="0" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>
That part worked out well yesterday as the stock imploded. The only thing holding me back was&#8230;.well, me. I got short and shorter thru 95 and was patient all the way until&#8230;.the 91&#8217;s. Which sounded great at the time, not knowing it would go to the 84&#8217;s. By which time I bought more stock and kept the long gamma game going by purchasing some July 85 puts.</p>
<p>Roll it all up and a lot of trouble to pretty much break even, although even sounds good compared to the initial ugliness of my put short. I&#8217;m now just long some gamma. For the moment, will probably sell some &#8220;wings&#8221; (OTM puts and calls) and call it a day.
</p></blockquote>
<p>A good recovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/07/sunday-options-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Volatilie AAPL?</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/volatilie-aapl/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/volatilie-aapl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[52 Week Lows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aapl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last September]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stenographer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uptick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AAPL is surprisingly not volatile given the health of Steve Jobs.  As Adam Warner writes in Daily Options Report, another example of financial media noise.

OK, I&#8217;m pretty sure I heard CNBC Chief Apple Stenographer Jim Goldman this morning mixing in talk of Steve Jobs New Liver and the recent volatility in AAPL shares.
Um, no.
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AAPL is surprisingly not volatile given the health of Steve Jobs.  As Adam Warner writes in <a href="http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Daily Options Report</a>, another example of financial media noise.</p>
<div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dFwaKOYqt-A/Sj-I7a-0wlI/AAAAAAAAIIQ/OYANm55stT4/s1600-h/aapl10.bmp"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5350145436775924306" style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left; width: 400px; height: 204px;" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/ecd5d_aapl10.bmp" border="0" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>OK, I&#8217;m pretty sure I heard CNBC Chief Apple Stenographer Jim Goldman this morning mixing in talk of Steve Jobs New Liver and the recent volatility in AAPL shares.</p>
<p>Um, no.</p>
<p>The graph here shows 10 day realized volatility in AAPL over the past 52 weeks. If by &#8220;volatile&#8221; he meant &#8220;52 week lows&#8221; then he spoke correctly.</p>
<p>Basically this pattern in AAPL exists all over the street, which is part of why options in general are not a great buy right now. This despite the fact that options are as cheap as they&#8217;ve been since last September. AAPL July options carry a 37-38 volatility or so, which sounds very reasonable compared to prices any time over the last 9 month&#8217;s, but in fact you would need stock volatiltiy to double from recent levels to have them pan out. It could happen of course as stocks do suddenly catch fire (see POT from last week). Just keep in mind that if you see an uptick in stock volatility, it&#8217;s already priced into the options.</p>
<div><img src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d6d00_12201456-4775514922208989892?l=adamsoptions.blogspot.com" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/volatilie-aapl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Soon Is Now?</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/how-soon-is-now/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/how-soon-is-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bond Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exceed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Actives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Driller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pullback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Report Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentiment Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smith International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Options interest is bullish as this stock is dropping.  Who is right?  When the bond market and the stock market disagree, it is usually the bond market that is right.  This from Daily Options Report:
Options order flow has the most value when it goes against the grain of the stock. Like this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Options interest is bullish as this stock is dropping.  Who is right?  When the bond market and the stock market disagree, it is usually the bond market that is right.  This from <a href="http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Daily Options Report</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dFwaKOYqt-A/Sj-YEv7L1bI/AAAAAAAAIIY/UMOgB9Ll9WM/s1600-h/smiths.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5350162089691043250" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 299px;" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/082c6_smiths.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>Options order flow has the most value when it goes against the grain of the stock. Like this one.</p>
<p><span>Houston-based oil driller Smith International (SII) is down $1.29 to $25.22, as a pullback in crude oil weighs on the drillers Monday. Crude was recently down $2.42 to $67.13 a barrel. However, while SII shares are falling, sentiment seems bullish. July 30 calls are the most actives, with 3,250 traded and 80 percent of today’s volume hitting ask-side. Another 1,290 July 37.5 calls traded, with 70 percent traded ask-side. While today’s volume doesn’t yet exceed open interest, ISEE sentiment data indicate that some customers are buying to open. Implied volatility is up to 62, from about 58 late Friday. </span></p>
<p>&#8230;If you are interested in more info like this, check out <a href="http://whatstrading.com/14-day-trial/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">WhatsTrading.com</a></p>
<div><img src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/082c6_12201456-5025514363614799966?l=adamsoptions.blogspot.com" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/how-soon-is-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VIX at Seasonal Cycle Low</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/vix-at-seasonal-cycle-low/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/vix-at-seasonal-cycle-low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruise Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Latitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neutral Position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seasonal Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth Of The Matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From VixAndMore by Bill Luby
With the VIX now getting comfortable in the 20s, there has been a fair amount of discussion about just how low we can expect the VIX to go in the next few months.
Back in April, in The New VIX Macro Cycle Picture, I predicted that the VIX will likely not drop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://vixandmore.blogspot.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">VixAndMore</a> by Bill Luby</p>
<p>With the VIX now getting comfortable in the 20s, there has been a fair amount of discussion about just how low we can expect the VIX to go in the next few months.</p>
<p>Back in April, in <a href="http://vixandmore.blogspot.com/2009/04/new-vix-macro-cycle-picture.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The New VIX Macro Cycle Picture</a>, I predicted that the VIX will likely not drop below the 25-27 area in the current bull market. That prediction has held up so far, but will almost certainly be tested during the summer months.<br />
<span id="more-672"></span><br />
Most investors tend to think of the summer season as something of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_latitudes" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">horse latitudes</a> of sorts for trading, with volume tailing off, portfolio managers on vacation and stocks sometimes set to cruise control. As a result, most people equate summer with lower volatility.</p>
<p>While the VIX does tend to follow a distinct <a href="http://vixandmore.blogspot.com/search/label/seasonality" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">seasonal cycle</a>, the truth of the matter is that we are now at the seasonal cycle low, with volatility historically increasing dramatically from June through October. In fact, over the course of the past two decades the increase in volatility has been highest from June to July, increasing by over 10% (1.82 points.) The pattern is quite distinct in the chart below, which shows composite monthly volatility from January 1990 through last month, using 100 as the series mean.</p>
<p>So…while volatility may indeed trend lower as some of the concerns about the global recession are put to rest in the next few months, lower volatility will have to counter the established seasonal cycle.</p>
<p>For some previous posts on the same subject, try:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://vixandmore.blogspot.com/2008/12/vix-annual-cycle.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The VIX Annual Cycle</a> (12/24/08)</li>
<li><a href="http://vixandmore.blogspot.com/2007/01/month-by-month-look-at-vix.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">A Month By Month Look at the VIX</a> (1/31/07)</li>
</ul>
<p align="center"><img src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/302b5_VIXmonthlycycles061909.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p align="center"><em>[graphic: VIXandMore]<br />
</em>
</p>
<p align="center"><strong><em>Disclosure</em></strong><em>: Neutral position in VIX via options at time of writing</em></p>
<div><img src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/43af6_897456774486153841-1340287877596627940?l=vixandmore.blogspot.com" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/vix-at-seasonal-cycle-low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diagonal Backspreads</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/diagonal-backspreads/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/diagonal-backspreads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade Setup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Spread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delta Neutral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Wolfinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Move]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrong Way]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Wolfinger was a market maker on the floor of the Chicago exchange for years.  It s hard to survive on the floor even though you are buying on the bid and selling on the ask.  Upstairs we have to buy closer to the ask and sell closer to the bid.  Nowadays [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Wolfinger was a market maker on the floor of the Chicago exchange for years.  It s hard to survive on the floor even though you are buying on the bid and selling on the ask.  Upstairs we have to buy closer to the ask and sell closer to the bid.  Nowadays the spreads have narrowed so even market makers aren&#8217;t living lovely like they were.</p>
<p>He knows his way around options and his blog has some interesting posts and discussions.  Here he discusses diagonal backspreads as a way to profit from a market move.  He wrote these at the end of March when the market was moving up.  It is something to keep in mind if the market ever breaks out of its range and moves down (or up some more).</p>
<p>In <a href="http://blog.mdwoptions.com/options_for_rookies/2009/03/back-spreads-standard-and-diagonal.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="Back Spreads. Standard and Diagonal">Back Spreads Standard and Diagonal</a> he talks about the risks of a credit spread.  Say you sell XYZ June 90 and buy XYZ June 100 calls.  If XYZ is trading at 92, you can do that for a credit.  The risk is that XYZ finishes somewhere between 93, say, and 100 where the calls you sold are more expensive and the calls you bought, the 100s have no value. </p>
<p>In a backspread you sell 10 XYZ June 90s and buy 15 XYZ June 100s.  Here you might be able to collect a small premium, which if XYZ goes the wrong way, down, would be your profit.  If XYZ moves past 100 those five extra calls give you unlimited upside. Again, if  XYZ finishes below 100 your long calls are worthless and your short calls could put you in the hole for $1,000 each.</p>
<p>In the next installment of our saga <a href="http://blog.mdwoptions.com/options_for_rookies/2009/03/backspreads-standard-and-diagonal-ii.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="Back Spreads. Standard and Diagonal II">Back Spreads Standard and Diagonal II</a>  he takes as an example the Russell 2000, RUT, which was at 429 at the time.  The diagonal constructed is sell 10 May 460 Calls @ 16.70 with a delta = &#8211; 363<br />
and buy 16 June 500 Calls @ 11.70 with a delta &#8211; 369.  So this is delta neutral initially.  </p>
<p>This might help you to follow his discussion.  </p>
<p>One way to look at this is as a calendar spread of -10 May 460 Calls/ +10 June 460 calls; and a backspread in June -10 June 460 calls / + 16 June 500 calls.  We have just added and subtracted the 10 June 460 calls.  The calendar spread does well if implied volatility increases and the June backspread does well if the stock rises rapidly to overcome the drag of time decay and decline of implied volatility which usually accompanies rising stock price.<br />
<span id="more-459"></span></p>
<p>You can triangulate the position the other way too.  That is, it is equivalent to a May backspread -10 May 460 Calls / + 16 May 500 Calls and a calendar spread -16 May 500 Calls / +16 June 500 Calls.  The backspread wants a move clear through 500 or not to reach 460 and the calendar spread wants an increase in implied volatility.</p>
<p>The last in the series <a href="http://blog.mdwoptions.com/options_for_rookies/2009/03/backspreads-standard-and-diagonal-iii.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="Back Spreads. Standard and Diagonal III">Back Spreads Standard and Diagonal III</a> shows the return graphs with the effect of changes in implied volatility.  It doesn&#8217;t show the effect of time decay which would give a surface.  Worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/06/diagonal-backspreads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dendreon Cut in Half Yesterday</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/04/dendreon-cut-in-half-yesterday/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/04/dendreon-cut-in-half-yesterday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trading Biotechs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Dendreon (DNDN) presented results of their drug trials at a conference.  The May options had an implied volatility of 200%.  At 1:00 PM it was trading at 24.25, at 1:30 it hit $7.50.  At 2:00 PM it was back to $22.50.  Today it is trading at $23.  What a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Dendreon (DNDN) presented results of their drug trials at a conference.  The May options had an implied volatility of 200%.  At 1:00 PM it was trading at 24.25, at 1:30 it hit $7.50.  At 2:00 PM it was back to $22.50.  Today it is trading at $23.  What a manic mover!</p>
<p>The implied volatility of the options yesterday was 200%, now it is down to 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/04/dendreon-cut-in-half-yesterday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Results From Friday&#8217;s Trades</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/03/results-from-fridays-trades/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/03/results-from-fridays-trades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trading Results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20th March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Array]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baidu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Mercantile Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conundrums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puzzles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straddles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Show and tell.  First the good news then the puzzles wrapped in conundrums buried in an enigma.  The solution is at the end.
Google
Google was the one that I thought would get pinned. See what happened.
Google opened the trading day Friday at about 330.5.  The highest it got in the day was 332.29 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show and tell.  First the good news then the puzzles wrapped in conundrums buried in an enigma.  The solution is at the end.</p>
<h3>Google</h3>
<p>Google was the one that I thought would get pinned. See what happened.</p>
<div id="attachment_250" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/goog20mar2009.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-250" title="goog20mar2009" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/goog20mar2009-288x300.jpg" alt="Google Price Chart for Friday 20th March 2009" width="288" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google Price Chart for Friday 20th March 2009</p></div>
<p>Google opened the trading day Friday at about 330.5.  The highest it got in the day was 332.29 and the lowest it went was about 327.  So it stayed within one percent of 330 all day long.  So I sold some 330 straddles at 10:00 and bought them back at 3 PM and wasn&#8217;t really worried all day long.</p>
<p>If you look at the price chart from Noon to 2:00PM and compare it to the SPY chart below, <span id="more-243"></span>you see that Google dropped with the rest of the market.  While the market, using SPY as a proxy for the whole market, dropped 2.7% in those two hours, Google dropped 1.3% about half the market&#8217;s move.</p>
<div id="attachment_248" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 281px"><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/spy20mar2009.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-248" title="spy20mar2009" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/spy20mar2009-271x300.jpg" alt="This follows the S&amp;P 500" width="271" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This follows the S&amp;P 500</p></div>
<h3>Autozone, Baidu, and Chicago Mercantile Exchange</h3>
<p><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/03/trading-expiration/">In Thursday&#8217;s post</a>, I saw that there was a large imbalance in the number of calls and puts set to expire Friday for Autozone, Baidu and the CME.  It seemed to me that this would tend to drive their prices down for the day.  Since when the call holders sold them for a profit, the market makers would unwind their position and sell stock.</p>
<p>This is the chart for Autozone on Friday 20th March 2009.  It is closer to a pin than dropping as I thought it would from the options open interest.</p>
<div id="attachment_246" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 292px"><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/azo20mar2009.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-246" title="azo20mar2009" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/azo20mar2009-282x300.jpg" alt="Autozone 20th March 2009" width="282" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Autozone 20th March 2009</p></div>
<p>The drop from Noon to 2 PM was 1.25% very similar to Google. And Autozone&#8217;s range for the day was from a high of 162 to a low of 157.  This is just 1.25% around the strike of 160.  Google&#8217;s range around 330 was plus or minus one percent.  So Autozone was almost as tightly tied to the 160 strike as Google was to the 330 strike.</p>
<p>The question is why was it pinned rather than driven down by the imbalance in the open interest?</p>
<p>This is what Baidu did Friday.</p>
<div id="attachment_249" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 292px"><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/bidu20mar2009.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-249" title="BIDU 20th March 2009" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/bidu20mar2009-282x300.jpg" alt="Baidu Price Chart for Friday 20th March 2009" width="282" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Baidu Price Chart for Friday 20th March 2009</p></div>
<p>Again, the range for the day was 172.43 to 177.   That is closer than 1.5% of the 175 strike.  So Baidu also traded like a pinned stock rather than one with downward pressure.</p>
<p>This is the CME chart.  It doesn&#8217;t have any particular behavior.</p>
<div id="attachment_247" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 290px"><a href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cme20mar2009.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-247" title="cme20mar2009" src="http://tradenakedoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/cme20mar2009-280x300.jpg" alt="Chicago Mercantile Exchange 20th March 2009" width="280" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Chicago Mercantile Exchange 20th March 2009</p></div>
<h3>So What&#8217;s Going On?</h3>
<p>You cannot tell what the stock is going to do by looking at the open interest.  First, there are a lot of people who are writing calls against their stock to try to earn some income.  That will inflate the call open interest.  Second, there are spread traders who are long and short puts and calls so that they don&#8217;t need to trade out of the options at expiration.  Third, there are put writers who are trying to get a better price to buy stock.  I read somewhere that that is how Warren Buffett bought most of his Coca Cola stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/03/results-from-fridays-trades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade Earnings Announcement</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/02/trade-earnings-announcement/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/02/trade-earnings-announcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Straddle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straddle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straddles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surprises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volatility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After writing yesterday’s post, I realized that my earnings trade for today should be fixed.  So I turned the trade around.  The key thing is that I made it into a long straddle waiting for earnings to come out after the close yesterday.
Here is the chart that shows the result:
Date       [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After writing <a title="Which is Better, A Strangle or a Condor?" href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/02/which-is-better-strangle-or-condor" target="_blank">yesterday’s post</a>, I realized that my earnings trade for today should be fixed.  So I turned the trade around.  The key thing is that I made it into a long straddle waiting for earnings to come out after the close yesterday.<span id="more-108"></span></p>
<p>Here is the chart that shows the result:</p>
<p>Date                 2/25/2009                    2/26/2009<br />
Stock    FLS         46                                                54<br />
45 call                          4.1                                               8.3<br />
45 put             3.8                                               1.2</p>
<p>Total                               7.9                                               9.5</p>
<p>Return      1.6 / 7.9  = 20%</p>
<p>Yesterday, I bought the 45 straddle, that is, calls and puts both with a strike of 45 which was close to where the stock, Flowserve, was trading.  It cost me 7.9 for each straddle.  They announced good earnings last night so the stock opened much higher.   Around 10 AM I sold the straddles for $9.50 each and made 20%.</p>
<p>Really, you only need to hold the position overnight.  The risk is that the volatility goes out of the options and they collapse in price.  But right now earnings are very volatile and there are a lot of surprises.  So it seems to me that this is a fairly safe trade.</p>
<p>More to come tomorrow.  I will try a few more of these trades overnight tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/02/trade-earnings-announcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buy Options or Sell Them?</title>
		<link>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/02/buy-options-or-sell-them/</link>
		<comments>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/02/buy-options-or-sell-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Folklore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lottery Ticket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Move]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarterly Earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Plot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncertainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volatility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradenakedoptions.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should you buy or sell options?
What do you think?
It depends.
If you listen to the folklore, 80 – 90% of options expire worthless.  That indicates that it is more profitable to sell options.
On the other hand, like a lottery ticket, an option can pay off big.  So you should buy.
What about the risks?
If you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should you buy or sell options?</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>It depends.</p>
<p>If you listen to the folklore, 80 – 90% of options expire worthless.  That indicates that it is more profitable to sell options.</p>
<p>On the other hand, like a lottery ticket, an option can pay off big.  So you should buy.</p>
<p>What about the risks?</p>
<p>If you buy an option, you can lose the premium you pay so the risk is limited.</p>
<p>If you sell, your risk is unlimited if you sell a call and the stock goes to the moon.</p>
<h3>Event Trades</h3>
<p>Like the event trade discussed in the <a title="Results of Delta Neutral Trades" href="http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/02/results-delta-neutral-trades/" target="_blank">last two posts</a>, it depends on what volatility will do and if you expect a spike in price.  The event we looked at this week was the Treasury Secretary’s speech on the fiscal stimulus plan.  The financial stocks are so volatile now that you can expect large spikes in price often.  So we bought.</p>
<p>Another common event is quarterly earnings.  As the earnings date approaches there is an increase in uncertainty about what the earnings will be.   Implied volatility may increase because there is a chance for a big price move on earnings.  That would be dangerous to sell.  Earnings are of ten announced after the market closes or before it opens.</p>
<p>If you are short the option and the price of the stock moves overnight against you, the only thing that you can do is sell or buy stock in the after hours market which is illiquid with larger bid ask spreads, or wait until the market opens to get out of your position.</p>
<h3>Volatility Trades</h3>
<p>As a first pass, compare historical volatility to implied volatility.  If implied volatility is much higher than historical volatility, that is a candidate for sale.  If implied is much lower than historical, you might want to buy.</p>
<p>Next look at how volatility varies through time.  Plot it.  Is the historical volatility low now or high?  What is the implied volatility of the options.  Answering these questions will help you formulate good trades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradenakedoptions.com/2009/02/buy-options-or-sell-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

